Civil rights and communication rights
Nondiscrimination rules are on my mind right now, because I’m in the middle of a paper about the subversion of the communications law “constitution” over the last few years. Through some regulatory gymnastics and helped by a credulous Supreme Court, we’re now in the strange position of having entirely private general-purpose communications networks that can treat communications like their own dinner parties. That wasn’t the structure we set up as a country for the post, the telegraph, or the telephone.
Someone asked me tonight whether the ability to communicate should be re-framed as a right. I’m wondering about that. We often frame the right to clean water as a human right, and we are beginning to do the same thing with the right to communicate online. (2003 article here has useful references.) I know this has been an IGF subject. It does seem that a clear nondiscrimination rule, structural separation of transport from content, and a commitment to government investment in universal access would do the trick and would have the added benefit of being clearer than a vague “right.” Also - right against whom? Right against the communication companies? Interested in views and sources on this.
===
Congratulations to Joi Ito, Larry Lessig, and everyone else at Creative Commons for the big win today - described here at the Lessig blog.